Saturday, 16 April 2016
In Defense of R-Rated Movie Characters Having Their Own Children’s Cartoons Read more at Film School Rejects: http://filmschoolrejects.com/features/r-rated-movie-cartoon-spinoffs.php#ixzz4644Knsvt
On this day in 1986, the animated children’s program Rambo: The Force of Freedom made its debut with the initial installment of a five-episode miniseries.
It was the first cartoon for children based on an R-rated movie and as a result was the subject of controversy months before it even arrived on the air (see this New York Times article from December 1985). Other seemingly inappropriate spinoffs would follow, adapted from such violent films as RoboCop, The Toxic Avenger, and Highlander.
For the past 30 years, I’ve thought this a strange decision by Hollywood. But it made sense for the 1980s, when R-rated movies were easily seen by kids and nobody thought the wiser (save for those critical voices represented in the NYT piece). Even more films of the sort, including Commando, had action figure tie-ins. It was the inverse of today, when parents complain about characters from children’s cartoons, such as Deadpool and Batman, winding up with R-rated or at least dark PG-13 movies not suited for kids.
There’s actually nothing wrong with it, though. No more than kids seeing their parents kissing but not being in the room when the couple is making love. No more than babies being introduced to Disney characters before they’re allowed screen time with those characters’ shows and movies. Children’s programs and R-rated movies can have the same characters and premises without having the same kind of content. Never mind that the Rambo animated series is still probably too violent for a lot of kids.
Labels:
CARTOONS NEWS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment